X100VI

TLDR version: I own both. Buy the Q3 43, it costs more but that’s because it’s much, much better. I wanted a decent quality, carry everywhere camera - better image quality and better ergonomics than an iPhone but lighter than a Z8 with lens. I’d previously had an X100T, but had never really got on w

There were a few reasons why I didn’t get along with the X100VI, and why I returned it to keep the RX1R III, even though I have an X-H2S (soon to be replaced by an as yet unknown Sony). The first was the autofocus performance. My X-H2S is acceptable, if not Sony good, but the X100VI is only ok in AF

Interesting results, and to be expected in the areas where a large sensor’s strengths lie, but surprised to hear some unexpected results with the X100VI regarding the EVF, autofocus noise, and gritty files. Disappointing to hear that the X100VI EVF underwhelms. Was it brightness, contrast, resolutio

I appreciate the thoughtful answer. The x100vi was not for me, I am a Fujifilm fan though. I’ve been looking at some of the inexpensive canons as maybe a gateway into some casual bird photography since the Fuji autofocus ain’t quite it.

I have 2 Nikon Z6ii and a Fujifilm x100vi. The autofocus from Fuji is nowhere near the top 3 (Sony, canon, Nikon) it just can’t compare. For wedding photography you really do need something tried and tested that will be reliable in all conditions.

The longer I have had my Fujifilm the more I’ve fallen out of love for it. I bought the X-H2S with an XF 150-600, coming from a Canon EOS 5D4 and 7D2. The autofocus was better than the DSLR’s for birding, and the features and performance to cost ratio was better than comparable cameras from other br