X-E2

Hard to say. The older ones were nicer with their lower dynamic range and more extreme color profiles. However they didn't have pixel remapping for dead pixels, and they had very smudgey and mushy image quality. They were still pretty competitive in AF at the time though. The X-T2 was actually bette

As others have said, on your body is really the best way. My preferred on-bike camera is a Fujifilm X-E2. The rangefinder style is great for portability as the camera is much less tall and can squeeze into some hip packs. I use the following: for smaller lenses: https://www.jansport.com/products/fif

Menor que isso, só uma mirrorless. Eu tenho uma Fujifilm X-E2, é bem compacta e tem uma a venda na Olx por 2600. Se quiser gastar menos tem as Sony Nex, consegue achar abaixo de 1000. Elas tem sensor APS-C , o mesmo tamanho da SL2.

Thanks for sharing your experiences and great photos. It's a shame you couldn't summit but High Camp is around 5,800m isn't it? A great achievement regardless. I've been narrowing down my camera options for an upcoming Three Passes trek - I have Fujifilm, Sony and Nikon options as well as my phone o

"Landscape" is straightforward, most people would say any you just want a relatively wide lens on any camera body. "Pocketable" is where it gets hard, because small portable cameras mostly got replaced by phones. The Ricoh GRIII is probably the only truly pocketable option, but it's not cheap. Proba