GFX100RF

I've had the 907x and though I thought I'd love it, but I didn't. It feels too much like a computer mimicking a classic Hasselblad. I'd only pick the 907x if you want to use it as a digital back, the X2DII has so much benefits over the 907x that it's a no brainer to me. I also had the Fujifilm GFX10

Coming in late to this. I used to shoot Sony, now have mostly Fujifilm, X and GFX. I'd agree with everything in the previous answer, and can add some thoughts: -I have a few other Fujifilm digital cameras and the GFX100RF is a completely different experience to the rest of them largely because of th

I don't think the upgrade is worth it in your situation. While the sensor upgrade is vast, the long optical zoom makes up for a lot of sensor size with... OPTICS! Upgrades are like that. To get upgrade from camera is at least triple the price. The Sony equivalent with a full frame señor and 60MP cos

I don’t shoot SL. But if I wanted to adapt my M lenses to a non M body it would be a SL. Fujifilm GFX has a very complex menu system and an overload of buttons and settings and mixed user interface types. It’s convoluted and not really fun to use. (I don’t particularly like my GFX100RF for that). Al