EOS R7

I just bought an S9 to supplement my Canon R7, and while I haven’t done much testing yet I can say the ergonomics are awful (as you’d expect), the build quality lacking (especially the buttons and dials), and the thing isn’t that compact or light (feels like a brick), the autofocus is worse (though

Full frame bodies will do better in low light but will be more expensive with more expensive and bigger lenses. There are different ways to compare FF and crop sensor cameras. When it comes to light gathering ability, a FF camera with an f/4 lens is just as capable as an APS-C camera with an f/2.8 l

To me, the lack of IBIS makes this camera DOA. As much as I love Canon colors, I think a Lumix S9 or a Sony A6700 offers way better value for just a little more money. It's a shame as I love my original EOS M for video thanks to it's size, and I hope the R7 II can fill that segment. I'd love a small

I have an R7, “rented” an R8 once…and have a couple of R4s. The R7 and R8 are similar size. I think they are too big. Particularly if you are renting small cars. They aren’t really better, or more sensitive, but they have arrows to tell you the direction the signal is coming from. But to get that, t

I am a Canon shooter and I’ve found that even the newer “full size” bodies like the R7/6/5 are smaller than my preference. The “pro-size” bodies like the R3 and R1 feel amazing to me but are just too bulky for an everyday multipurpose camera. I’ve shot 5Ds for decades and still prefer the chunkier g

Personally, I suggest neither camera, especially if weight's a concern for you. Camera-wise, the Canon R7 weighs 530g (slightly more with the battery); the Z50II weighs 495g. Then you get to lenses. Canon's EF-mount 100-400 (there is no RF-mount version), which you'd have to adapt to RF-mount, weigh