EOS R6 Mark III RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM Lens Kit

You can get a refurb Z8 for new A7V money if you hunt the sales. Z6iii is much cheaper and still extremely good, if you don't need the pixels, the Z6iii is simply a better choice than the A7iv (in fact I'd argue the Z5ii is generally a better choice than the A7iv, having owned both) Despite the use

Do you need it now? The Z5ii is cheaper and satisfies all your requirements, but since it's new it hasn't been discounted yet. If Canon or Sony introduces an R6III or A7V, the previous models will get discounted too. I wouldn't consider the S5IIX since video is not your focus. Realistically the Z6ii

I have good news on the first point, my friend: Canon isn't claiming any particular technological leaps with this sensor, but our initial testing shows that it has even faster readout speeds than the lower-resolution chip found in the EOS R6 II. The R6 III has some truly impressive rolling shutter r

I have the em1ii with the 12-40f2.8 and the 40-150f2.8. I enjoy the system overall but recently decided to run a dual setup with canon r6iii paired with the 24-105 and 100-500. Honestly, I’m actually enjoying the canon a lot more. It isn’t as heavy as I’d feared and the IQ is incredible. I originall

Canon and Sony produce pretty similar results so I think it really comes down to which one you prefer. I’ve worked with both at different agencies and I prefer canon myself. Not because it’s better, I just prefer the menu systems and how the cameras feel in my hands. Here’s what I absolutely wouldn’

Could've gotten a Canon R6iii with an insane lens but nope you got a slow and clunky 100mp camera with a no continuous af

Go with the Z6III.R6III is the little bit better camera, it has better AF, more MPX, opengate video etc, but as you said, lenses are more expensive, and you cannot buy 3rd party lenses for RF mount.On the other hand, Z6III is great...AF is fast, 24mpx is more than enough, it has raw video, and you c

Nikon ZR, Canon R6III if only shopping for new. if you’re open to used options, get an a7sIII or FX3. the dual native iso at 12800 of the Sony’s is insane, but the ZR and R6III still hold their own at 6400. r6III would also have the advantage of being a non-compromised photo camera, in case you ever

I recommend having a checklist of essential photos along with the schedule so you aren't trying to figure out what you need on the fly. Learning some poses and getting inspiration for what the couple likes helps a lot. Scout the venue and immediate area ahead of time, either in-person or google maps

You have pretty great camera for docs really, and w24-70 is great too The main problem with canon is that it’s expensive not underperforming. Now if you wanted 2 more R6ii or r6iii and 3x24-70… it gets pricy. R5m1 is overheating but the rest is rather fine. I doubt 70-200 will be that useful but wit