EOS R6 Mark III RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM Lens Kit

You can get a refurb Z8 for new A7V money if you hunt the sales. Z6iii is much cheaper and still extremely good, if you don't need the pixels, the Z6iii is simply a better choice than the A7iv (in fact I'd argue the Z5ii is generally a better choice than the A7iv, having owned both) Despite the use

I have good news on the first point, my friend: Canon isn't claiming any particular technological leaps with this sensor, but our initial testing shows that it has even faster readout speeds than the lower-resolution chip found in the EOS R6 II. The R6 III has some truly impressive rolling shutter r

Go with the Z6III.R6III is the little bit better camera, it has better AF, more MPX, opengate video etc, but as you said, lenses are more expensive, and you cannot buy 3rd party lenses for RF mount.On the other hand, Z6III is great...AF is fast, 24mpx is more than enough, it has raw video, and you c

Hmm. Thanks for the input. R6iii has false color as well, as far as I know. Def leaning towards Lumix, but for what I need I think they're pretty evenly matched, especially with Canon's better AF & included OLPF.

The Canon R6 II and Nikon Z6 III are good mid tier options. The Z6 III is newer with a faster partially stacked sensor. This reduces EVF blackout in continuous stills shooting & rolling shutter jello in video. The Canon R6 III is supposed to launch later this year depending on how quickly you're loo

the ZR shoots in many other formats as well. before considering a camera like the A7iv, consider the sensor readout speed and if the rolling shutter it produces is going to be an issue for you or the much slower frame-rate. if so, you would need to go to the Nikon Z6iii, Canon R6iii, or Sony A7v.

If you want to work efficiently Canon has a notably intuitive and tactile body and menu, the sensors are good, colour science is good, but the lenses are limited and expensive. Why not download sample RAW files for some of the Canon bodies like the R6 iii or R5ii and see what you think of the colour

Different. You want high Megapixel/ cropping reasons or not. The R6 Mark III is way more than enough. The R6 II is still a workhorse camera.

Canonrumors said that the R6 III was supposed to get the R3 stacked sensor but it didn’t. Would be great to see Canon do it so that Sony and Nikon will follow.

Absolutely not, I've owned and tested the D5, various Z6, Z8, Canon R6 II, R6 III, Sony A7S III, A5 IV, and A7RV... all of them are better handling noise at high isos. The A7III and A7IV are FAR superior. Any modern, high end, backside illuminated sensor camera is by definition better at low light t