EOS R6 Mark III RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM Lens Kit

I haven't used an R6III, but I use an R6II from time to time for contract work, and I own a Z6III which I have as much primary camera body. Answers to your questions: If you're starting from scratch, both will be easy to learn and grow with. I find Nikon and Canon to be both be relatively intuitive

I have the em1ii with the 12-40f2.8 and the 40-150f2.8. I enjoy the system overall but recently decided to run a dual setup with canon r6iii paired with the 24-105 and 100-500. Honestly, I’m actually enjoying the canon a lot more. It isn’t as heavy as I’d feared and the IQ is incredible. I originall

While I agree with you - to some degree I think that era of old entry level canon dslrs should be long forgotten. They were reliable but dreadful to use, noisy and with shitty autofocus. This is precisely the case for an upgrade, no matter of which camera OP will but differences will be significant.

Imo the FX3 doesn’t generally would make sense in a vacuum but there is competition and Sony has allegedly registered the FX3ii which means it will probably be released soon. I think the biggest pros for the FX3 are lowlight, great autofocus, easy to edit files, full sensor 4k and also compatibility

Could've gotten a Canon R6iii with an insane lens but nope you got a slow and clunky 100mp camera with a no continuous af

For most intents and purposes, and certainly for 95% of photographers across the spectrum, mirrorless cameras are an upgrade over their DSLR counterparts in almost every way. Better sensor. Better AF. Better processors. Better performance. Better size/weight. Better features. Better support. Etc. Th

Thanks! I've been working for years with a Canon R6 and rf100-500. I'll see if I can afford to upgrade to the R6 mark III or at least mark II next year. The extra pixels and improved auto focus really sound great.

You have pretty great camera for docs really, and w24-70 is great too The main problem with canon is that it’s expensive not underperforming. Now if you wanted 2 more R6ii or r6iii and 3x24-70… it gets pricy. R5m1 is overheating but the rest is rather fine. I doubt 70-200 will be that useful but wit

Go with the Z6III.R6III is the little bit better camera, it has better AF, more MPX, opengate video etc, but as you said, lenses are more expensive, and you cannot buy 3rd party lenses for RF mount.On the other hand, Z6III is great...AF is fast, 24mpx is more than enough, it has raw video, and you c

I shoot with three Z9s. Used to have the Z6II also + tried the Z6III as well. Had a D750 until the D850 came out (think the D850 is the king of all non-integrated battery grip DSLRs). A few of my second shooters use R5s/R6 IIIs, A7 IVs and their AF isn't any better from what I see in RAWs. The Nikon