EOS R5 C

Feels like everything they’re doing should’ve been done five years ago. As a happy C70 owner, who just needs a good B cam/photo camera that won’t break the bank and also shoots the same profiles as the C70, it’s honestly infuriating how embarrassing Canon’s hybrid offers are. For video shooters or e

I think IBIS is very important for stills. I would not want to lose out on it. Now that Canon has updated the firmware on the R5 to eliminate the overheating, a big drive for the R5C is gone, so I would not consider it a significant upgrade over the R5

It is frustrating. But I imagine it is not an oversight. I imagine it's a misguided ploy to sell their (c) suffix mirror less cameras, the r5C etc. They are the only ones (I think) that allow shutter angle as opposed to shutter speed. In the canon line (obviously their cinema cameras do).

Ok just watched a video on the xf605 and read a comparison to the Sony pxw-z200. The aperature and focal lengths are really impressive. Better than I would get with glass for an EOS without spending thousands. They both seem like pretty similar camcorders but the Sony has an even longer zoom so I fe

That’s what I was wondering. Like I’m not constantly holding the camera to get action and artsy shots or running around the property. I’m capturing static shots on a tripod. So I don’t need something light and ergonomic. So that was my thought, use case. So that was my thought, cinema cameras for ru