EOS M50 Mark II

The optical quality will be terrible (chromatic aberration, flaring, softness), and with that huge focal length and narrow aperture and no image stabilization, you will need to shoot with a tripod. These are cheap for a reason. I'd wager you'll get far better shots by using an EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6

If you own an EF-M camera currently, it's very much alive because you have it. I absolutely loved my dual M50s, and I loved the pictures I took with them. The EF-M 22mm f2 may be the best street photography auto-focus lens ever made. Adapting vintage and EF lenses is trivial. But there are problems:

Si lo que quieres es empezar sin gastar una fortuna pero teniendo buena calidad, fíjate en cámaras que sean ligeras, fáciles de usar y con pantalla abatible para grabarte tú misma. Modelos como la Canon EOS M50 Mark II, la Sony ZV-E10 o la Nikon Z30 son muy recomendados para creadores que recién emp

I actually went with the Canon EF 70-300mm IS USM for wildlife stuff and it's been solid. Had mine for like 3 years now and no issues with AF or stabilization. The Tamron might give you slightly better image quality in some situations, but Canon's reliability is worth the trade-off when you're out i

I built what I call the L series killer setup here's the list Body Canon eos M50 mark ii Efs-m adapter Zooms 18-55mm usm is af. Sleeper if you shoot manual 28-135mm usm is af. Events workhorse 28-80mm usm af. Beautiful rendering super fast af good all around lens 55-250mm stm is af. Mid telephoto fo

If you want a camera, I give you 3 options canon eos m50 mark ii Sony ZV-E1 Panasonics lumix g7 First, I recommend these three cameras because they’re budget-friendly and compact, which makes them ideal for solo shooters or handheld shooters. However, if you get a tripod, that’s even better. Be awar