Surfshark

And in my experience working in the industry, the ones like Nord, Surfshark, Raid etc are the ones paying very little upfront to anyone. They'll do commission, and target 100s of accounts to advertise with.

Raycon is a simple to explain one, they are much lower quality than many competitors at a similar price point. So they slap on the illusion of quality and relentlessly market themselves to corner the market. Surfshark and Nord VPN are singled out because they are VPN's. They don't do most of the cla

Incogni Surfshark nordvpn hostinger its the same company behind them

Surfshark is owned by the same entity as NordVPN. They are associated with Tesonet, a company which has a data mining arm (OxyLabs). I would suggest you stick with the PrivacyGuides recommendations for VPNs, that is, Proton VPN, Mullvad, or IVPN: https://www.privacyguides.org/en/vpn/

Yeah, there's also ProtonVPN, Surfshark, Nord... There's a bunch. I just hate that I need this. This is ridiculous, I'm 29 years old. I should be able to visit adult websites without being policed.

Nord owns surfshark, that's why nobody would mentioned it Lol

Surfshark may have been sponsored to flag it as unsafe like AVs flag cracks as their own category. Youtube tried all kinds of stuff againist the site over the months

Completamente genial fazer deepfake de uma senadora. Pode acreditar que não vai acontecer nada Zé MBL, ctz que seu Surfshark free trial vai impossibilitar a PF de te achar

"no goole/meta type monopoly" ahem... Kape does exist.and Surfshark is owned by Nord so I mean...

Ter o tapete puxado pela Insider é facilmente uma das coisas mais tristes, os caras são a triade (insider, manual, surfshark) de financiamento de programa merda/low effort que deixa vários picareta ou pessoas ruins passarem, que eu não tankaria isso e nunca mais entraria na internet se eles me remov