a7S II

My main question would be why there's 2 lenses there that are essentially doing the same thing. I'd also not bother with a gimbal as a beginner too fwiw and why 2 tripods? The 1DXii was a great camera in its day but it's really starting to show its age now If you're a beginner i'd look at something

Hey there, Z6III video shooter here. I'll preface this by saying I don't shoot a lot of video, but I make a couple of travel videos a year when I go on holiday and almost all of them contain some level of low-light/nighttime footage. I will regularly shoot up to and at 12,800 on the Z6III and be com

keep the a7iv for photography and more run and gun stuff. IMO 12,800 iso on sonys is overrated and used moreso as a crutch for event videographers. It is helpful for dark wedding receptions and concerts where you can’t always setup lights. But if you’re transitioning to more commercial stuff you’ll

I prefer the colours from the GH6 to the G9ii and GH7. In fact I prefer the colours from the GH6 to anything I have used. It is especially pretty in natural environments I have found. The autofocus is not that bad though I do prefer manual, having said that I prefer manual on my phase detect cameras

FX30??? I haven't done this, but it is in my "roadmap" of purchases. I currently have a pair of A7sII bodies on 70-200s on the side for the over the shoulder vow angles, but the 8-bit isn't cutting it. I don't feel like I really NEED the full frame for these angles as I'm running the FX3 and A7sIII

The noise happens at pixel level Photon shot noise exist without any sensor at all, without any pixels. All the pixels do is that they divide the noisy image to small squares and count the photons from each square. The photon statistics do not magically change by adjusting pixel size. Or if you want