a7R III

Most compact cameras are on the slippery side to be honest. I also agree with u/postmodest , my current full frame is A7R III. It just works so plainfully and boringly good. Every time I use my Sony, it just works and gets it right every time..... but I don't know, I just feel detached from the phot

I was born in Plainfield in 1954 and grew up going into the city both by car and train. Later in life I found myself living in Alabama and chasing a woman who worked in Manhattan, so I was flying in every week or so for about a year (all prior to the 9/11 attack). I don't remember the last time I wa

Do you spend most of your time viewing the back screen while the camera is on the tripod? I’m not sure if your experience will be that much different If that’s the way you’re shooting. The benefit for me when I switched to Sony from a Canon DSLR was the ability to use crop sensor lenses on the A7R3.

No. This is a click bait post. You are baiting people asking them if an entry level M/43 camera and lens can compete / produce an image the same as one taken with a 42.2MP Full Frame Sony A7R III and Sony FE50mm F/1.2 lens (stopped down to f/1.8).

Edit: sorry, I've just seen you have a Fuji xs-10, my bad. I consider 20mp to be the bottom end of medium-format scanning and just fine for 35mm, with prints up to 8.5x11. I've tried a 14mp sony a7sii and it wasn't enough. You'll be fine with 26mp. ESPECIALLY with pixel shift, forget about it. You'r

Enjoy the Qs. I have a Q3 43 as well and love it (I’ve had all the other Qs, but 28 isn’t my preferred focal length). Now for the part you’re not going to want to hear. You need (yes, I said “need”) to try the SL3 with one of the APO Summicron-SL lenses. Because you have the Q3 43 I’m going to recom