a6700

I'll start this off by clarifying I only have experience with Sony & Olympus / OM systems. I've tried to use the Sony A6700 and the Sony 90mm for handheld insect macro photography and eventually gave up. The sensor readout time and buffer were too slow for my style of photography. I ended up going w

A6700 only has 800/2500, 12800 refers to FX3, A7Siii, that's why I'm afraid with my APS-C

I can be a massive jerk being 100% serious, so let's go. 7CR/7CII is lighter than the A6700, has better battery life, better resolution (R has MUCH better resolution), and better low light sensitivity. The idiot actually bought APS-C lenses 🤭 silly head, you buy full frame lens for when you grow up

I second this for the r7 (no, I don't shoot canon lol). It's so feature rich and built for wildlife. Apsc, 33mp (don't see a lot of those), 15fps. Canon is a good ecosystem for wildlife, lots of lens choices (I kinda regretted going sony for this reason, but with apsc the 70 350 is great). The r7 is

You will need APSC lens that is 1.5x sharper in lp/mm to produce an image with the same overall sharpness (in lp/ph) as an FF setup. This is not likely the case, and thus FF setup often produce sharper image. Here's some of the sharpest Fuji APSC primes compared to FF. XF16mmF2.8 R WR (63 lp/mm cent

But with the a6700 I'm reaching 900mm because it's apsc, and with a7v I'm reaching just the 600mm. Reach is measured in resolving power, not focal length, and not field of view. Motion blur, ISO noise, atmospheric conditions, optic quality, etc. etc. all affect your reach. I've owned an A9 since the

The gap between full frame and aps-c is smaller than it's ever been. Yes, the introduction of Sony A7C bodies that are almost similar size of APS-C makes it clear. Also the third-party lenses options for full frame are much larger than for APS-C. I had lost a lot of money on APS-C lenses, I wish I m

Considering the specs and features, I would compare the a6700 to the OM-3, not the OM-5. The OM-3 costs more but has a fully-stacked sensor, it's a bit larger than the Sony but weighs the same. The Sigma 18-50 is not comparable to the Oly/OM 12-40 f2.8. The Sigma's focal length starts at 28mm equiva

a6700 has a 1.5x crop sensor and turns 20mm to 30. Is it wide enough for your use? For wildlife, 300/450 is a bit short. I think the cheapest camera with PreCap probably is the OM-1.1 and you can pair it with 100-400 II (Mk II has Sync IS, IBIS + OIS, but not I. Sync IS allows you to shoot slower SS

Before buying new gear I'd try taking photos on a brighter day that lets you keep the ISO under 800 while still using at least a 1/1250 shutter speed. Newer cameras have pretty good high ISO performance but you won't be getting super sharp images at 3200+ iso. You can still get fine images that like