Sony
a6700
Based on 752 Reddit mentions
$1498.00
We may earn a small commission.
Most discussed features
Sentiment summary across the product areas Reddit users mention most.
Reddit mentions
Original Reddit posts and comments behind this analysis.
M43 Lens
I have this lens for my A6700 and it's one of my all time favourite lenses ever, and that's after having a dozen m43 and Sony lenses. However the reason I love it on the A6700 is because it would be equivalent to an 18.5mm f1.4 lens on m43, while being pancake sized. Its a really neat focal length,
...man__i__love__frogs in r/M43
May 12, 2026 1:34 PM
17
Full Frame as a hobbyist?
I always used APS-C format DSLRs, then I bought a Sony a7iii and currently I have an a6700. I prefer the a6700 because of its size and the size of the lenses.
Minus_uy in r/AskPhotography
February 2, 2026 9:44 PM
21
Camera Recommendation for High Altitude
I largely agree, with two bits of food for thought. First, for the A7CII, I have the HMG camera pod. It takes some tweaking to attach it to various backpacks, but I find this way better than strapping the camera to a shoulder strap out in the open. It provides padding and weather protection, and is
...eggnoggin0 in r/Mountaineering
May 12, 2026 2:56 PM
7
Am I missing something?
The point OP is making is valid and it's a hard pill for some of the people in our community to swallow. We often have posts on here talking about how wonderfully small and compact, yet capable our cameras are, which is true of the older M43 bodies - it's certainly the reason I joined the M43 platfo
...Genoxide855 in r/M43
October 21, 2024 10:11 PM
53
Is it still one of the best? Any newer alternatives?
RX100vii is still the most capable as of Spring 26. Best? Not easily answered. Ergonomically, it is a difficult camera to use - the APS-C (Sony, Fuji) are much better ergonomically and photo quality is similar. Price on the RX100, even used is ridiculous. No weather sealing. The viewfinder is barely
...rennyrenwick in r/RX100
May 5, 2026 5:51 PM
6
OM-3 or A6700 for travel?
Out of these 2 I'd go for A6700. It's more compact, and it's got ergonomics that was not outdated 50 years ago. If it was me choosing I'd go for OM-5 with 12-45 if size really mattered or OM-1 with 12-40 if I could "afford" a little bigger and heavier setup.
ColossusToGuardian in r/M43
April 2, 2026 7:26 PM
7
Kamera zum Birden
Von denen, DEFINITIV R7 + 100-400. Ziemlich ordentliche Kamera und wiegt nicht viel. Die P950 ist eher für Beweisfotos bei gutem Licht. Wenn du eher in Wäldern oder anderweitig bei wenig Licht unterwegs bist, kannst du dir auch die Sony A6700 + 70-350 anschauen. Die ist sogar minimal leichter und ko
...GrusVirgo in r/BirdingGermany
March 24, 2026 10:30 PM
7
Sold my X-T2 to downsize to X-M5
Yes. If a smaller camera means you'll take it more places and take more photos, then yes it's a great idea. I sold my Sony A7II with a 24-70 f2.8 to get a Sony A6700 with the Sigma 18-50 f2.8 and it's a night and day difference carrying it around! Have fun!
PlushyLycosa in r/fujix
January 18, 2025 10:37 PM
32
Got a new lifer on Easter Sunday! Green Heron
I am using the Sony a6700 with 70-350mm lens. This is not a full-frame setup, so my images aren't as high-res, but I chose it for how lightweight and easy to carry it is. Most professionals(which I am not) use full-frame for the highest detail possible, but that type of equipment is a bit heavier an
...-knave1- in r/birding
April 21, 2025 2:07 PM
31
Why Lumix G95/G90 is not mentioned frequently as G85?
Because the G95 was launched at $1200 with 12-60mm kit lens, which was around the price of a used G9, a more capable camera all around. Moreover, MOST people do not need unlimited recording, so they were totally fine with 10 minutes limit on 4K 60p & 29 minutes on 4K 30p on the G9. And people who di
...lordvoltano in r/M43
June 8, 2024 9:17 AM
28