a6700

The OM 100-400 II is actually only barely lighter than the Tamron 50-400 and Sigma 100-400 (both very similar in specs to the OM). Of course, the 20MP MFT sensor of the OM-1 still squeezes more reach out of 400mm than the 26MP APS-C sensor of the A6700 (Fuji's 40MP sensor actually beats the OM-1 on

Only 1 of the 4 lenses I mentioned is apsc one (not even the first one) And cropping from 61 Mpix FF to apsc crop leaves you with the same image as a6700 with the same lens Don't tell me you never cropped image? Not to mention that for standard range the FF lenses are reasonable in size and price so

I'd love to see actual pictures from this and have them compared to various point and shoot cameras or say the Sony alpha 6700 or other Mirrorless cameras. What is the quality of the photo, not just the megapixel number

I have the om-5 and a Sony a6700 and honestly, I would like faster computational stuff and af. And maybe a more robust shell. A pipe dream would be Panasonic lens fixes in Om soft like how the panas do it with the automatic fringe deletion and stuff

Weird - I can.

“Using the Sony A6700, Sigma 18-50mm, 1/1000, F/5.0, 160 ISO. The image looks good to me, but I feel her face is a bit out of focus. Maybe my eyes are playing tricks on me?”

My goodness, that's a lot to take from one sentence I wrote! Maybe I'm having an issue of communication and could have been more clear. I never said they're ignoring APS-C. I even said they have great options, and recommended one in particular! I just said that Sony's focusing on full frame, and I t