FP L

I think this is because nobody really knows how to use the RAW workflow. Some do, many don't. Many don't spend enough time to understand the way a camera's dynamic range is even used. The Sigma fp when processed well seems to have more than enough dynamic range. Again, if you know how to expose the

The Sigma FP has internal RAW recording since many updates ago, you just need high-speed SD cards (I'm actually shooting 12-bit internal RAW with some v60 cards and it works fine). Coming from a Magic Lantern 5D MKII, it feels like a nice upgrade to me. No more fighting with Magic Lantern randomly r

I have the FP L. I got it because my research suggested it was the better of the two for photography (vs video). I have adapted voigtlander glass (m mount to L mount) and I also picked up two sigma lenses (24 and 45). I like it as a contrast to Fuji (my other main system) for colours and the ability

I've been really struggling with the decision of what newer camera to buy. I had a bad experience with Sony and Nikon Z, because I am so spoiled by the colors and contrast of my CCD DSLR collection — especially the Pentax 645D — and my Sigma fp. Ergonomics are important (hate menus), and I need real

Hi Former FP & FP L owner here. I've also owned a xt 3. I really like the FP & the FP L. It is very compact and very dense. It is one of the smallest full frame bodies I've come across and when paired with the sigma I series lenses makes for a very portable unit. If you like megapixels the FP L with

Sony F3 and Sigma FP here! Nice toys to play around, superb colors, but havent have te opportunity to use them for work yet.

same here. I was already tinkering with camera DNG negative film “scans” in DVR as I’m much more comfortable in Resolve than Lightroom (mainly a video guy), so this was the best news ever. I’m still trying to get my raw capture exposure and negative conversion workflow sorted out, as it’s a little t