S95F

A lot of that test was super subjective and depends on your viewing area. The S95F absolutely freaking sucks in a lit living room because the screen turns purple and the blacks are basically gone. You lose a bunch of the benefits of OLED. Now, I have a QD-OLED in my office for gaming, and I have the

I bought a Samsung s90f, s95f, and LG G5 to compare side by side. I ended up keeping the G5 because of its vastly superior motion handling and processing. The s95f was the worst of the three because of the matte screen, absolutely awful speakers, and the one connect box. I really liked the s90f thou

Mi ultima tragedia, la tv samsung s95f oled con antireflejo, le cayeron manchitas de jugo, al intentar limpiar quedo la tremenda mancha. Es DEMASAIDO delicado, que no puedes usar ni limpia pantallas, ni agua, ni paños microfibra usados, solo alcohol isopropilico nivel 70 según samsung, wea que tampo

I wish it wasn't matte, I prefer glossy overall after owning a G5 and S95F, the Samsung went back.

I may edit my reply, but this "washing out colours" thing is basically misinfo. You've spent the entire time glazing QD, and honestly exaggerating the benefits. The Bravia II is probably the best example of the tech and it still has less accurate colours than the G5 out of the box, only winning with

I hear you. I was between the S95F and the G5 recently. I saw both at the store and actually loved the matte screen (controversial take apparently), BUT I ultimately bought the G5 for a few reasons (Dolby vision for movies, LG quality control seems better than Samsung’s reputation for it, and got a

Drive to the US to buy it there. The 55" version is much more worthwhile for the extra brightness, the S95F has several issues with the Color Space that display the wrong colors, and Samsung just refused to fix this, only correcting it in the S95H. The matte coating of the S95H was also improved to