Q7 M5

Q5 Pro / Max discontinuation was a loss. It was actually better than its successors, like the Q7 M5/L5 cost-reduction crap. That Q5 was made with build quality, probably too expensive for roborock to make sufficient margin in this price range and competition. I recently found a Q5 Max+ on local onli

I've got no hard evidence for this, it's just a feeling, but I think the Q7s and Q10s are manufactured for roborock by some other vendor. They seem very un-roborock like and the difference in quality was noticeable to me as well. They're made in Vietnam, different to every other roborock I've had. I

Thanks for taking the time - thorough response. I appreciate these tips. I did land on the S5A, it’s OOS :( https://us.roborock.com/products/roborock-qrevo-edge-s5a That Q7 M5+ (lulz at this modelname , cmon roborock) — it’s a nice price point but I’m quite convinced that DuoRollers or DuoDivide are

Q7 M5 isn't comparable. It's engineered for production cost savings to make it cheap cheap cheap and has none of obstacle avoidance. As if it's not a genuine Roborock but rebranded from a different manufacturer. I would definitely stay with Q8 max as long as it's available. Please forget those meani

You are happy with a S8 Ultra. The topic here is about Q7 M5+. This is an entry-level, rebranded non-genuine Roborock model with completely different software and protocol. It is worse with less features than its predecessor Q7 Max+. It is just cheap.

The Q models are in Roborock's budget line. They are stripped down versions of better models, and therefore do not have certain features and capabilities but also cost much less. Personally, I would prefer a refubished S8. Beyond this, I cannot answer your question. The Q7 M5 may work well for you o