Grit X2 Pro

I moved from the Garmin Forerunner 735xt, which was introduced to the market in 2015 or 2016 to Polar Grit X2, and to be honest, sometimes I feel I downgraded. Of course, my Polar is much better in terms of hardware, but the watch's firmware and especially the mobile app are sometimes giving beta ve

I moved from Garmin Forerunner 735xt, which was introduced to the market in 2015 or 2016 to Polar Grit X2, and to be honest, I felt I downgraded. Of course, Grit X2 was much better in terms of hardware, but the watch's firmware and especially the mobile app were sometimes giving me beta version vibe

There are other watches wich can stand 14 to 20 days in normal smartwatch mode. Dunno how they do. Both of mine (MIP and Amoled) are empty within 6 days latest. Polar has at least one software version in two different hardware setups. The GritX 2 pro is almost the same. The new city watch again is c

Garmin fenix is out of my budget, garmin instict is just ugly for me. Only option is polar grit x2 but polar doesn’t have bouldering, only inside climbing but I have no idea how much of a difference it makes

I’ve had a Polar Grit X2 Pro Titan for 14-months, and it’s about to turn into a brick. I’ve had a handful of incidents where it rebooted in the middle of a workout, but again, relatively rare events (albeit frustrating when you’re well into a long workout session given you lose all of the data). Ove

Polar has watches that are WR100 but if those will work properly on your wrist in water with apnea diving I don’t know. They can measure a HR of 15-240 though. See page 191 https://support.polar.com/e_manuals/grit-x2-pro/polar-grit-x2-pro-user-manual-english/manual.pdf

I've been using Garmin for many years and have tested Coros, Polar and just Suunto in the last two. At the beginning of the year I had the Polar Grit X Pro when it came out. Of all the ones I've ever worn and tested together, it was the worst choice. If so, I would have kept the new Suunto 2, but in