
Nikon
$1,006.95

Panasonic
RedDB rating based on Reddit opinions
Reddit score
RedDB's algorithmic rating based only on relevant Reddit opinions.
It uses one opinion per author: their highest-upvoted mention.
Evidence volume, recency, and votes affect the result.
The opinion count and sentiment bar include all analyzed relevant opinions; the bar does not represent the score out of 100.
$3697.99
We may earn a small commission.
Sentiment summary across the product areas Reddit users mention most.
Original Reddit posts and comments behind this analysis.
It is impressive how Panasonic can do this handheld, even on the S1R II, and everyone else bar Olympus/OM System can't even merge tripod pixel shift photos in-camera.
Hour_Firefighter_707 in r/Lumix
July 25, 2026 at 12:36 PM
18
Great video article and real pictures that back up your statement. I'd say this article is more valid than most affiliate so called gear reviewers out there who didn't even shoot any real events, maybe at best a couple hundred shots in the local park. To answer your question, I am not sure why that
...MichaelsHardline in r/Lumix
June 9, 2026 at 1:04 AM
14
From what I understand, the 24mp (SL, Q1, M10, M240) and the 61mp (Q3, Q343, SL3, M11) are the same as the sensors in the A7 series. I don't know about the SL2S or the TL or the CL. The Q2 and SL2 are using something developed in collaboration with Panasonic (it's in the S1R too) The M10r has a one
...meta4_ in r/Leica
January 24, 2026 at 2:46 AM
16
The honest answer is…the z8 and z9 are better cameras for the wildlife purpose. Albeit they are very large. My S5ii and Sigma 150-600 came to around 2.5k..that’s less than one Nikon Z8. So I’d expect it to be the better camera. The sigma 150-600 is a nice lens, the autofocus is slow though. The zoom
...punn1 in r/Lumix
November 2, 2025 at 11:43 AM
13
Having owned the S1R and now the S1Rii, the original was a much nicer built camera, with great design touches, I much prefer it from a handling perspective. (I miss the top screen!!) But the S1R’s autofocus is pretty crap, if you’re doing static portraits and landscape work it’s fine but good luck d
...rudermanphoto in r/Lumix
February 26, 2026 at 9:07 AM
10
So I’ve scanned 120 with three cameras, a Panasonic S5II, a Sigma FP L (same sensor as A7RV), and a Leica SL2. If I’m brutally honest with you, the A7RV isn’t overkill..in fact…it is not enough to properly reproduce grain for massive prints. You want a Lumix S1R in high-res mode. (It is the same as
...Agloe_Dreams in r/AnalogCommunity
August 5, 2026 at 12:41 AM
5
Went round the houses and for a pro do it all camera you can't beat Lumix s1ii for value and performance. I think people get sucked in by the colour fidelity of the S1r ii but actually have some real world problems like slower AF + battery life. Feedback from one pro says strictly a studio or creato
...frog67park in r/Lumix
August 2, 2026 at 6:32 PM
5
I swear by these Zeiss ZE lenses, I have a good set with: 15mm, 21mm, 35mm, 50mm Planar 1.4, 50mm Makro-Planar and 100mm which are by far the best ones of the range. These haven’t been updated on the Milvus range (apart from 50mm 1.4 and 85mm 1.4). I have the Sigma adapter and I use it with Panasoni
...AnalogReborn in r/VintageLenses
May 21, 2026 at 9:01 AM
5
Good points. On the one hand, it's like they're making these cameras for YouTubers who also do photography, and that's obviously a tiny market. On the other hand, many people try to get into that world, and it's not too hard to make a good hybrid these days. That said, I agree that the specialty vid
...focusedatinfinity in r/photography
December 2, 2025 at 3:12 PM
8
Over the past eight years, I’ve shot professionally with Sony cameras. I’ve used the a7III, a7IV, a7R V, and the FX3. They’re solid tools, no doubt about it. When Panasonic released the original Lumix S1, I decided to try it out of curiosity. I loved a lot about the camera, but the autofocus perform
...pattovt in r/Lumix
December 20, 2025 at 12:25 AM
7

Nikon
$1,006.95

Panasonic
$1,783.47

Nikon
$679.00