LUMIX G95D

Few factors : - Lumix has always been a bit of a video-centric brand, ever since the GH1 released. Most of why peop[le bought Lumix cameras for was very often the excellent video specs compared to the price point, and not really their photo capabilities (which are still good) - Olympus has a HUGE ba

The OM-5 is a winner in most ways. But the spec sheet doesn't actually capture how versatile and good Lumix AF system is, even the lowly 49 point system. You simply can't understand if you've never used it. Although you may get something of a sense based on reviews of the prior G95 such as this one:

I owned an E-M10 Mark II and loved it, and wanted more. Don't get a III or IV, Olympus hobbled the features, particularly the RAW Photo Edit, and the IV feels light and plasticky (I bought it and returned it). I owned a Panasonic G95 briefly and hated it. Rolling shutter, terrible menus, idiotic wor

Look at the OM-5 (either Mark) and a 12-[whatever] mm M43 lens. Used. You should also consider the Panasonic G95/G97 & the Olympus E-M5 Mark III. The Mark III has a weak tripod mount but excellent autofocus.