DC-G97MK

Few factors : - Lumix has always been a bit of a video-centric brand, ever since the GH1 released. Most of why peop[le bought Lumix cameras for was very often the excellent video specs compared to the price point, and not really their photo capabilities (which are still good) - Olympus has a HUGE ba

But aren’t you comparing a full frame (S5) to a MFT (G85)? I’m assuming that’s the reason for the image quality difference. I’ve owned the G9II and hated how large it was - it was basically a full frame body with a tiny MFT sensor. Its specs were overkill for my uses and for some reason it would ALW

I have both cameras, the difference in size is absolutely minimal (they even take the same battery grip). The G97 has better image quality and much better ergonomics with dedicated ISO, WB and exposure comp. buttons and three dials. The screen is also a massive improvement, easily visible in direct

Virtually all my gear is Panasonic, so I can’t say much about the OM-1. And I’ve never felt the need for a 25mm lens, so I can’t comment on that either. If you’re mainly doing stills, another camera to take a look at is the often neglected G95, now rebadged as the G97. Basically the same guts as the