OM-D E-M10 Mark III

OM isn't 'the poorest system' for landscapes. That's a narrow mindset of the uninformed (usually FF shooters who've never used M43 and go by specs). It's extremely difficult to tell the difference between 11 or 12 stops in a print (for example). The difference is more in the operator than the gear.

You got one of the biggest m43 cameras and don't use pro glass, that's just the worst of both worlds. If you want a portable setup you should get a more portable body, and if you want good IQ you should get better glass - either way it's cheaper than switching systems. If you want to go full frame t

I have owned a camera from almost every system being produced but I always find myself drawn back to Olympus M43 cameras. I have a Fujifilm XH2S but I seem to prefer my Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III, to the point that I'm seriously considering selling my Fuji kit to get an OM-1. It's so sad how Olympus

My simple answer is* you can buy better cameras, but in for the things m43 is particularly good at - only for more money* m43 works really well for most things, but other systems work better for some* m43 weakest points vs full frame cameras are high-iso noise and dynamic range – but it is still perfe

Very true. Olympus/OM System M43 cameras are the only ones I can easily hand-hold a 5 second exposure with no blur. I take long exposure light trail night photography with those cameras all the time because I don't need to lug a tripod around - just a compact camera and just as compact lens. It's ab

Nikon, Fuji and Sony get all the hype M43 does not. Also these two brands have cameras that sell well enough to place them at the top of the sales charts. Regrettably OM System and Lumix G series don't get the hype and don't have the sales. I'm not here to throw shade at anyone. I'm just calling it

I have been going on photowalks in Seattle area for past couple of years and I always see a bunch of m43 cameras in there. I think most people there do have a second or third system (FF or APSC) but since photowalks are casual and mostly focused on street photography, many people prefer to bring the

My primary system is Canon but I have some M43 stuff. My M43 experience isn't super extensive, and I've used APS-C and FF cameras extensively, too. I don't have experience with the newer OM-1, but have used an EM10 I and EM10 III, EM1 a bit, and a couple Pens. Here's my general "experience" as a poi

First of all, this isn’t targeted at you, OP. I may let out a bit of frustration here because these posts are every other day. You just caught me with some time to rant. I never understood the “M43 is dead” argument. I’m not saying it’s impossible, I just don’t understand the criteria. The fundament

I have done a similar thing with my old E-M1 II once. Was on a trip in the jungle, dropped my camera with 12-40 mm Pro lens on it into the mud. Like, there was no way to get it off without rubbing it into all nooks and crannies. So I just grabbed my water bottle and washed the mud off the camera. Wo