E-M5 Mark III Body Black

No idea why the price would be less given same condition/shutter count. But go for the OM-5. Might as well have a newer camera with newer processor and more features (Hand held high res, LiveND, starry sky AF, supposedly improved IBIS). The fact that OM released an om-5 mark ii without resolving the

I use my camera almost exclusively for family life. 10 bit video, reliable human tracking and good stabilization are the main things to look for in a hybrid dad cam. I wouldn’t recommend an OM-5 or GX9 for your use, because they both lack 2 out of the 3 things I mentioned above. I’ve owned an E-M10

You have conflicting priorities. In a lot of ways most phones are better than a GX85 for video - autofocus, formats, etc. GX85 has very outdated autofocus technology and video formats. I cannot describe it as “good”. I describe Panasonic G9 as “OK” and Panasonic G9II as “good”. Phones are on G9II le

The OM-5 is to the E-M5 III as the E-M1 III was to the Mark II. Nothing mind-blowing, but some very notable computational photography and autofocus improvements with modestly upgraded IBIS. I think there was extra disappointment with the OM-5 because many Olympus fans had existing gripes with the E-

I've been trying to tune in my mirrorless scans of 120 film and have not been all that successful with it. I'm using an Olympus e-m5 mk III camera with a 20mp 4/3 sensor plus pixel shift to give 80mp files, a Nikon Micro 40mm f2.8g lens, an adapter between them and a Cumulus holder that attaches to

Man sieht immer wieder Preise zwischen 1400€ - 1500€. Die OM-5 II würde ich ehrlich gesagt nur empfehlen wenn jemand viel Landschaft fotografiert und ein maximal leichtes Setup braucht, das auch wetterfest ist. Wenn du viel Familie fotografierst, ist die Gesichtserkennung einfach zu schlecht. Ich ha

I moved from an em5 iii with the 12-40 f2.8 pro to an a6700. In terms of size, if you put the sigma 18-50 f2.8 on the Sony, you're probably winning in terms of size but have a slightly narrower zoom range (13.5 - 37.5 cf 12-40 M43 equivalent, so more noticeable at the wide end). For heavier lenses t

IMO, the OM-3 is clunkier than the OM-1 due to lack of ergonomics. You'll find you have to set it down, put it away, or use 2 hands to use it far more than an OM-1, which can be easily carried hanging from the tips of your fingers in 1 hand and easily operated 1 handed with lenses up to around 600g.

Ok, then let's say OM System is relying on the after-market for some accessories. :-) In my opinion, the cost to develop, build, and warehouse low volume accessories could easily exceed any retail profit. Yes, Olympus had a hand grip for the E-M5 Mk III (and OM-5 Mk I) but how many have you seen peo

The issue with the EZ lens, it’s prone to failure and build is not robust - especially for young student. As an EP2 to Em5ii user and waiting for an upgrade worth investing in, I agree as the IQ has stalled for over a decade. It would be nice to have the PD chip but for me, I value Image Quality ove