Z7

I had much the same experience with the A7iv, I'm happier with my Z5ii and the output from it even though the A7iv was thoroughly competent. The resolution has nothing to do with it, it's all in the lens design (which is pretty wildly different between some of the lenses in the system) and the colou

But the Z8 does have top of the line DR, just not quiet as good as the Z7 / D850. But not really in a practical way for 99.9999% of shooters. I had a D850 (among others) and switched eventually to the Z8, I have never once felt there was a meaningful or even noticeable difference. Sure it looks roug

they are different tools, the z8 can shoot much faster, has some specific wildlife modes in its af and the faster sensor allows for better video. so for wildlife the z8 is better since that is what its designed for, the telephoto lenses on z mount is also a bonus. on the other hand the a7rV has a hi

Except that the A7R does have a high speed readout sensor, more than twice as fast as the Z7/Z7II has despite having more pixels. That being said, despite the additional pixels it's not resolving much (in some cases, any) more detail or DR than the Z7 does, and Nikon has rarely been about spec chasi

100% Z6 ... The only problem of this camera is the intelligent autofocus (Focus to the eye, tracking subject), but if you keep old school using the Focus points, the camera is amazing, same imagen cuality as a Z5II and better (more dinámic range) than Z6 III, profesional body (same as Z7 the top Nik

Yes exactly i wanna maybe crop from time to time but i wanna do as much as possible to do right composition at place. I said "professional" becouse tony trump said this is more entry level camera... and i found out that 26mpx on sony a6700 which i had was not enough. When I look at specs of nikon z7