Z6

I shot motorcycle racing professionally for a few years with various older bodies in 2018-2020. Canon 1D III (not the X) , Nikon D3s and later personally with a Z6 I. They all worked fine. People truly show their colors pretending the autofocus is 'unusable' or 'garbage' Fact is a Z7 II has better a

The problem is other brands early mirrorless didn't suck This is just not true. First two FF Sony Alpha gens (A7 and A7 II) were issue-ridden, with lackluster color science, abysmal battery life, and mediocre AF. The first really good Sony mirrorless body was the A7 III. Canon RP was a piece of junk

That's exactly what I did with my Z6. The Z 40mm f/2 is the only Z lens that I kept because it's both cheap, good and small. But Z cameras have advantages over D bodies. The First one is obviously stuff like goof live view AF that you don't get on any Nikon DSLR save for the D780. The other is IBIS,

I've used all the lenses in question for a long time and I primarily shoot birds. Most people should get the 180-600. It is ridiculously sharp even at 600/6.3, well priced, covers a wide range, has a super short zoom ring throw, has a good MFD, excellent VR, and solves every complaint people had wit

Danke dir! Die Kamera ist eine Z6, Objektiv ein Sigma 150-600mm F5-6.3 DG HSM C (FTZ Adapter). Settings waren 500mm bei f6, ISO 6400 und 1/3 Verschlusszeit, wobei die Bilder teils nochmal stark gecroppt sind. Die Z6 hat einen Top Sensor (gleicher wie in der Sony A7 III). Da mein Hobby vor allem die

I understand. I just upgraded to the Z6iii from a D800. I compared the D850 and rented it but decided to go with the z6iii. The D850 is still a great camera but it’s old technology that is getting older by the day. The image processor on the z6iii is 2 generations newer than the D850. It has higher

I've been a newspaper photographer for nearly 40 years, and spent a few years covering conflicts in South Africa back in the 90's. I'm kind of semi retired at the moment, but this is my experience. If you're not using a full frame camera, you might as well just shoot everything with an iPhone Pro. I

I never had any issues with the Z6 for more static photography, e.g. street, landscape, travel, portraiture. I left mine in AF-C on wide-area small, and it was great. I don't think I could tell the difference in output between a Z6 and the 24MP EXPEED7 cameras for these genres with the same lens The

So I come from a unique perspective, where I did the same thing 5 years ago, except I went from an E-m1II + E-M1X to a Z9 and Z6. Had all the 1.2 Pro lenses too, like it was balls-deep-peak-Olympus. What I learned, was no matter what you get in Nikon-land, it’s going to be better than an E-M1II, whi

Hi, I came from an XT-5 myself (having an Xt-3 before), going to a z8, and I have made several comparisons on reddit over the past 2 ish years detailing the difference between the two. I have also shot a Zf, z6, and z6iii. Here are my findings: Pro Nikon: Fuji build quality is in the toilet, in my o