Z fc

every camera that has any aspiration in being a retro body should be available in both silver and black, as both silver and black film cameras were generally available. Fujifilm undestood the assignment, all of their retro bodies come in either black or silver (if not more). But both OM and Nikon re

Yeah if you sort both subs by New and follow them for a while it does seem like there are more images and less chatter on Fujifilm. Probably several thi gs going on. Nikon historically has been more widely known and has made a lot more cameras than Fujifilm. A lot of gear questions in this sub are a

According to a direct translation of the case: "Case Type: Dispute over royalties for the provisional protection period of an invention patent" Considering Viltrox is a lens manufacturer and Nikon is a camera manufacturer, it is extremely reasonable to surmise that this is about the Z mount. I agree

Unless Nikon is willing to invest in developing a new APS-C sensor, maybe partially stacked like in the Z6iii, the Z50ii (and maybe new Z30 and Zfc equivalents with the EXPEED 7 processor) may be the end of the line, in my view. As much as we love these cameras, it’s a shrinking market, and Nikon ha

My main issue is that it's essentially a toy that will cost nearly $1000 after tariffs. For that same price, you could get a Nikon Zfc, a cheap F-mount adapter, and some actual vintage lenses. An actual film enthusiast would just buy a film camera. You could get a nice, solid rangefinder in pristine

Nikon USA now has the oem ZFC grips that match the camera. Much more expensive than the other grips and doesn’t have features like being arc compatible. https://www.nikonusa.com/p/extension-grip-for-z-fc/17146/overview

Not sure on the exact repair cost but anything that involves opening the camera up is going to be $300 minimum + you have to hope parts are in stock. I know when I had issues with my Zfc it had to be sent into Nikon to fix and it was around $530 but all they had to do was replace the Exposure Compen