Mozilla VPN

I had a similar situation but I was using Mozilla VPN instead. Mozilla VPN also uses Mullvad under the hood. Switched to Tailscale with the Mullvad plugin and it works no problem. Though I did have an issue with DNS leaks, you'll have to check that on the Mullvad test page and follow the instruction

There’s good Electron and bad Electron. For years I’ve used Mozilla VPN (a rebadged version of Mullvad) and have not had any issues with the app. Right now it’s taking up 0.8% CPU and 140 Mb memory. Much more important to me is the transparency, security and privacy protections (e.g. no logs kept) o

I agree, dang it x 2. @alex, aside from split tunneling, what other features would we be missing if you were to supply an official and verified Flatpak version of Proton VPN? I ask because I'm currently using Mozilla VPN as Flatpak right now, which is officially available via Flathub, but my first t

Had their vpn for a year. Never again. Connect to vpn and latency up to 300ms or even missing packages. Tried various configuration. Ovpn, wireguard, tcp,udp etc. For contrast i had mozilla vpn once gor a year and it was best experience i ever had with vpn. Going to buy mullvad or mozilla vpn soon.

Yeah Mozilla vpn is basically WireGuard wrapped in a minimal GUI. Works okay on windows but their Linux implementation is barebones. On the replacement side I’ve been running Windscribe on Mint for over a year. It autostarts, reconnects if the connection drops, and the command line app is surprising

I can't speak for the person you are asking but Mozilla vpn has worked great for me. It is a paid option though.

Just use a VPN like Mozilla VPN. It's around $5 a month. I use it no problems. Good luck.

I use Mozilla VPN. I think they use the mullvad technology and infrastructure but you also support the development of Firefox with your payments. The app is dead simple and the connections are stable and fast.