
XREAL
$399.00

Meta
RedDB rating based on Reddit opinions
Reddit score
RedDB's algorithmic rating based only on relevant Reddit opinions.
It uses one opinion per author: their highest-upvoted mention.
Evidence volume, recency, and votes affect the result.
The opinion count and sentiment bar include all analyzed relevant opinions; the bar does not represent the score out of 100.
$289.00
We may earn a small commission.
Sentiment summary across the product areas Reddit users mention most.
Original Reddit posts and comments behind this analysis.
These recording-glasses are destined to be a favorite product for two groups of people: influencers and creeps. It will be hard to distinguish between the two. But seeing people wearing these glasses will be a clue to stay far away from them. The fact that the on-while-recording white led light is t
...AbeFromanEast in r/technology
May 7, 2026 at 8:15 PM
3.8k
In the subreddit for the meta glasses it is a common theme to see people posting about ways to turn the recording light off or block it. Very creepy, especially when stuff like this goes on.
broNSTY in r/technology
February 19, 2026 at 2:09 PM
3.7k
My Meta glasses are my every day prescription glasses. It didn’t even dawn on me not to wear them. They're a recording device. So how it "didn't dawn on you" that they wouldn't allow your recording device is absurd. You have the option to have non-recording glasses. Meta eyeglass people are the wors
...Spare-Shirt24 in r/legaladvice
May 9, 2026 at 6:13 PM
306
In a roundabout way this is ultimately a good thing. These glassholes will inevitably tarnish the reputation of anyone wearing smart glasses, all the while sinking the privacy abomination that is Meta just a little more.
endgamer42 in r/technology
May 7, 2026 at 8:23 PM
171
Meta's camera-equipped "AI Glasses" are so divisive that some adopters are now leaving their expensive smart glasses at home, as Engadget reports. Influencers, mostly men, have been using the glasses to inconspicuously — and non-consensually — capture footage of themselves approaching women and atte
...notanfan in r/whennews
July 14, 2026 at 2:59 PM
123
Next worst thing to Meta Rayban video AI glasses in my opinion.
AusLokir in r/Vent
May 17, 2026 at 12:03 PM
115
So, firstly - fuck Meta. However, VIDEO CAMERA GLASSES are a thing. Not smart/AI/internet glasses. Just video camera glasses. And they're less than $50 on Amazon for a pair of 1080p, or a little more for 4K. Obviously don't be a creep and do shit like what OP's article talks about, but they'd be a h
...Clear_Tangerine5110 in r/technology
January 29, 2026 at 2:36 PM
340
“Name Tag,” as the feature is called, would let smart glasses wearers identify people and get information about them from Meta’s AI assistant, the report said. Is there any benign use for such a feature? It's like they're deliberately marketing this thing to stalkers.
pr1aa in r/technology
February 24, 2026 at 6:15 PM
332
I work in eye care and my office locations are refusing to sell meta or any other smart glasses. We will not participate in the surveillance state. When you go to see your optometrist, let them know that you don’t approve of them selling a product that harms women and people of color.
UgenFarmer in r/Feminism
February 24, 2026 at 2:46 PM
300
He might actually be wearing the meta 'smart' glasses which is probably worse.
_Levitated_Shield_ in r/ImTheMainCharacter
March 14, 2026 at 11:16 PM
286

XREAL
$399.00

RayNeo
$299.00

XREAL
$549.00