Q11 Meta

I think the little coaxial tangerine drivers used by kef in all their designs are fundamentally flawed due to the inescapable issues arising from on\off axis variance, diffraction and distortion that come with using coaxials; leading to a speaker that's difficult to position and prone to listening f

Luckily for me they are excellent off axis (KEF Q11 Meta). He can stay haha

I'll chime in here even though it's not exactly what you're shopping for: I previously owned the MA Silver 300's and have since upgraded to the KEF R7 Meta. The Silver 300's were more 'fun' but noticeably forward in the upper midrange and the highs did get harsh when played loud. The KEFs are much m

Well, actually, I had a trial period for both the ML Motion Foundation F2's and a set of KEF Q11 Meta towers for comparison. Other then the F2's having a bit more of the highest frequencies, the Q11's were just better on imaging, sound stage, and transient attack so I decided to keep the KEF's. Now,

I have Cornwall IV's, and I'd say imaging isn't their strength, moreso that large live scale sound. I also have kef q11 metas and they image better. I have the Cornwall's in a dedicated treated space with a single listening chair so they're set up about as well as one can.

I'm not super familiar with the speakers in your list, but I do agree with the previous comment on the monitors vs. the B&Ws for bass response. In that price range and being in EU, I'd have a good look at the new KEF Q11 Metas. 3 way, plenty of bass, nice wide sound stage with the uni-Q. I am a dieh