IPVanish

In this specific case, it's not just a matter of logs: Europol infiltrated the service and gained direct access to the user database. The point isn't that they were "secretly recording," but that the infrastructure was operationally compromised. Skepticism about no-log VPNs in general has real basis

ProtonVPN free ➝ Free, Unlimited data. Windscribe free ➝ 10 GB per month data but faster compared to ProtonVPN free. Mozilla's Proxy extension ➝ Only available in USA, UK, Germany, France as of 17/04/2026. 50GB/month limit. Mullvad or IVPN ➝ If you can pay then these are the most private VPNs you ca

We actually ended up following this guide to configure firewall rules for IPVanish on Linux (one of the leakiest VPNs we tested), retested it, and it no longer leaked. That said, we had trouble getting custom firewall rules to work on Windows. What OS are you using?

Read this article theres an agreement called five eyes, nine eyes and now fourteen eyes. Basically countries have an agreement to spy and share user data with each other. You want a VPN that doesn't operate in one of those countries or truly has no logs. Reading that article Private Internet Access

Privado is affiliated with Pango, according to pitchbook.com profiles, and Pango is the company who was responsible for all the Hotspot Shield data sharing, traffic redirections and other shady stuff. They apparently also are still running on the old Ziff Davis and IPVanish infrastructure. IPVanish

Proton VPN-t még mindig a Tesonet viszi? Csak mert azok arról híresek, hogy adatbányász gecik és eladnak mindent rólad, plusz azt hazudják, hogy nem logolnak, de közben meg igen. IPVanish “No-Logging” VPN Led Homeland Security to Comcast User | Hacker News Ja meg pluszba vannak ilyen cukiságok is: 5

Mullvad has had a good record thus far. But, so did IPVanish until we learned they were logging in the past. If a capability exists, it can be used. So, you have to trust that they won't ever do that. "Don't trust. Verify." is a core belief of the cypherpunk movement, and to date, only one VPN let's

Because they are US based, they can be court ordered to collect user data. This has happened to other "no logs" VPNs in the US before, such as IPVanish, Riseup, etc.

and the logo often comes from a holding company nobody's heard of. Express vpn, IPvanish, strongvpn all owned by the same parent. The brand you're trusting and the company actually handling your data are not always the same thing.

Well it does matter. The FBI requested information recently from Proton via the Swiss courts regarding a user that used Proton Mail that resided in the United States. Now if the FBI already had everything they needed they wouldn’t have needed Proton’s information to identify who the person was. Coun