X-T200

The X-T200 is fine as a camera, but it has some limitations : - first is that you cannot reprogram all teh buttons the way you want, so if you use it for a while you will probably end up frustrated by the lack of user customization. - second is the fact that it uses a Bayer sensor, not the X-Trans t

I've also surveyed for Sony and its colours turn me off, especially its greens just fall flat and green is a colour I place importance in due to the tendency of me shooting nature. I was also considering Olympus OM5, Fujifilm XT200... But Olympus' micro four third sensor turned me off as I want to s

If you want the true Fujifilm experience, you need to get a camera with an X-Trans sensor—meaning no Bayer sensor bodies like the XF10 or the X-T200. That’s why, out of those options, the X70 is your best bet. But I’d also look into the X-E1, E2, and E3; they’re just as compact, and you might find a

X-T200 doesn’t have X-Trans sensor, the absolute essence of using the Fuji system, so please no!

I was thinking about trying Fuji cameras because of their film simulations. Then I realized that everything is more expensive (Fuji bodies ridiculously hold value), lenses are more expensive, build quqlitt is not better than Olympus or Lumix, features are definitely not better. As for X-T200, it has