GFX100S II

There are many people making a living of Fuji and you can easily find them on the internet. Fujifilm places user experience first (something Pros often value less than, say, reliability or sheer AF performance) and uses APSC sensors for their x-series cameras, which many on the internet like to fram

I have the Leica Q3 28 and the Fuji GFX 100S II... I have the 55 f/1.7, 45-100, and 20-35 lenses for the GFX. The GFX is so much heavier and slower. It's a beast. The 110 is a beast of a lens also, i think it's approx. the weight of the 45-100... it's something to lug around. The Q3 is relatively (r

The digital back has some advantages over the typical body since you can use older/newer leave shutter lenses with an flash, over the ports at the bottom of the camera. You also can use the old 500 series bodies to use older hasselblad lenses. And of course the lifestyle aspect if I want a medium fo

I bought the GFX 100S II last year after using Canon for a long time, and the transition was smoother than I expected. I have a couple of Fuji lenses but I also picked up a Fringer converter for Canon lenses and a Kipon adapter for Pentax 645. I don’t use them often, but it’s great to have those len

Love the lens but not so much the body. Not entirely sure I’d swap to another system, but if I did and if could do an even swap…I’d go for a Fuji GFX 100S Ii and maybe something like a Ricoh GR3x for smaller daily driver kit

There-is-no-wrong-answer AND - There-is-no-right-answer: I hate that :) Makes it so much more difficult to choose. I do this to myself, every single time, when there are more than one 'good' choice to make. Both are equally capable (essentially same sensor). The Fuji has video capabilities (I don't

Fujifilm GFX 100s ii. Best for beginners