GFX100S II

There are many people making a living of Fuji and you can easily find them on the internet. Fujifilm places user experience first (something Pros often value less than, say, reliability or sheer AF performance) and uses APSC sensors for their x-series cameras, which many on the internet like to fram

I have the Leica Q3 28 and the Fuji GFX 100S II... I have the 55 f/1.7, 45-100, and 20-35 lenses for the GFX. The GFX is so much heavier and slower. It's a beast. The 110 is a beast of a lens also, i think it's approx. the weight of the 45-100... it's something to lug around. The Q3 is relatively (r

The AF-C is impressive for Hasselblad, but Fujifilm's GFX 100 II still has better autofocus performance. I own a GFX 100 II (and an X2D) and have tested the X2D II against it; Fujifilm's GFX 100 Ii consistently outperforms the X2D II in most situations. The only time the X2D II beats the GFX 100 II

My main point for the Hassy being better for landscapes really just comes down to an itty bitty better dynamic range, and I think that truly will be negligible if most if not all cases. If you would've said portraits, I'd say GFX for their 55mm and especially the 110mm. Only exception to that would

I’ve shot with the R8 (24MP), R7 (32MP), Nikon Z8 (46MP), and am now using a Fujifilm GFX100sII (100MP) My experience is that often times you are constrained not just by the pixel count, but also the quality of your lens, any motion blur, and atmospheric fog/distortion if you are shooting far. The Z