EOS R6 Mark III Body

Genuinely confused as to how you could get this so wrong. The S1II and the A7V are the same price currently in the US ($2899), The R6 III is $100 cheaper, Nikon Z8 starts at $3100 used on MPB, and the A1 starts at $3400 used. At $2356, the S1ii a DEAL. Let's break this down: - Photography: all the b

I really wish they would put higher density screens in the EVF's for sure. I had a Sony a7III and now a Canon R6 III and I can still see the individual pixels after 8 years of technological advancement :(

I would probably go for the Canon R6 III as it will still give you a huge bump in auto-focus performance and give you a lighter, more compact body while saving a decent bit on the budget. Buying used from a reputable seller is also a great way to save on the costs. Tamron does not have a 300mm prime

You’re right — I phrased it poorly. The convergence itself isn’t surprising; what surprised me was how tight it is across sensor generations (24MP SL2-S vs 60MP SL3-P vs CCD-era-adjacent M10). I expected more body-specific drift in the shoulder position or toe handling. The fact that 43/43 folds on

If you are liking the Canon experience, I would get the Canon R6 III or maybe even the R5 II and get an EF to RF adaptor to use your old lenses. You can just get the 24-70mm USM to pair with it also.

The Z8 is the better video camera. Both shoot excellent 4K120, but the Z8 is more robust for video work because it has better sensor readout, higher-quality oversampled footage, and fewer compromises in modes like 4K120 and 8K recording. It also handles heat and long takes more confidently, and give

Ich würde von der Canon R6 II auf die neue R6 III gehen. Wechselbereit? Wenn, dann höchstens in das Nikon-Universum und dann evtl. auf eine Z6 III oder Z7 II. Um es genauer sagen zu können, müsste ich mich mehr mit Nikon befassen.