PG32UQX

I sold my PG32UQX for a C4 and regret it a bit , kinda like more the tradeoff of blooming and peak nit vs pixel perfect black but burn in chances, might jump on this one , 5k 27'' will be crazy

Remember when the definition of a good HDR gaming monitor was the ASUS PG32UQX, which was a 1152-zone MiniLED monitor for $3,000? Those were dark days.

burn in and brightness gimme 1000 nits and 6 year burn in warranty for 1k euros and ill buy 1 until then imma keep waiting around for a PG32UQX sale/competitor

I owned the PG32UQX, and I currently own the PG32UCDP. Tell me know you've never seen the products in person without telling me you've never seen the products in person. I desperately tried to find Bloom on the Mini LED and it just wasn't there under normal circumstances. But the fact that my Mini L

Hi. This doesnt work for me. I use a Asus 32k 4K 120 hz Monitor (pg32uq) and it looks in every Mode Not that good. When I Look up it runs with around 70-90 hz and if I turn 120hz off it will run 4K 60hz and looks shit too. So no matter what I do it doesnt run smooth or looks nice. And ofc i use 2.1

Until you admit your mistake. I asked you, do you know how to read measurements? Because if you look at the AW3225QF or the PG27UCDM for example, they're some of the most accurate gaming monitors you can get right now (not accounting for the heat affecting tracking on the AW for example) https://www

I see no LD difference in game mode, maybe the tone mapping is less processed but that's it.Most Rtings tests show barely any difference, maybe 100 nits less in highlights at most which is not noticeable on 2000 nit displays. Cooling is not an issue that would cause less sophisticated LD and worse c

The main issue with mini LED is the dimming algorithm plays a large part in how how much blooming you will get. Currently you really need a g-sync ultimate chip for the best results. This is why the PG32UQX performs so much better in blooming than the newer BenQ EX321UX. Hopefully the g-sync pulsar

300 nits instead of 250. I wouldn't wait for that. He'd be better off getting the TCL 32R84. Hdr1400 and 1000 nits sustained brightness with nearly 1500 peak brightness, not to mention it costs less. Its hdr capabilities rivals the asus pg32uqx. If he's looking for a 4k monitor I'd never recommend o

PG32UQX is discontinued now. I have not actually tried the monitor but I have experience using Samsung VAs with bad response times. The inverse ghosting drove me mad in darker games and the PG32UQX has even worse response times than those panels. The only difference is Samsung VAs would ghost in dar