T-Rex Ultra 2

Probably the most unneccesary release I've seen from Amazfit, alognside the T-Rex Ultra 2. They haven't been able to keep up with the Helio Strap demand, still unable to sell a single replacement band for the Helio Strap, the calories algorithm is still super high, sports like swimming are still lac

Thanks for sharing. If Amazfit irons out these navigation issues and improves routing on the watch and maps, it will overtake Garmin. Garmin is leading with very detailed but laggy maps. Also, Garmin routing often freezes or breaks which you noted but many reviewers (even DC rainmaker) do not say, p

The existence of the Ultra line doesn’t make sense to me. Amazfit watches are good because of their strong price-to-features ratio, you can overlook the drawbacks since they are cheaper than competitors. But "premium" models with the current level of software and especially the length of support are

I would get the Active 3 Premium myself with these requirements. Really nice device. No dual-band GNSS, but on the whole that is not really necessary if the GNSS implementation on the whole is good, which it absolutely is on current Amazfit watches. Using the Helio Strap as my primary HR monitor in

"Bashing Amazfit"? Because he point out a weak point? Some people in this subbreddit are Amazfit fanboys and you just act like one of them. Yes, some Amazfit devices are cheaper than other brands, but there are also expensive ones like T-Rex 3 Pro, Balance 2 or upcoming T-Rex Ultra 2. And the softwa

I compared the T-Rex Ultra 2 and T-Rex 3 Pro to a Suunto Vertical 2 and Amazfit's Climb needs still A LOT of work. I also had a Fenix 8 and that watch worked very good in my tracks. It is a lot worse in Amazfit in convoluted tracks where you repeat parts or round-trip. I feel that orange climb notif

u/Ariquitaun it is official information. You can find it yourself at many cached sites in Google. The T-Rex 3 Pro has 64Mb of RAM and the T-Rex Ultra 2 has 96Mb. I find route creation super fast and no crashes at all. There are probably big software improvements but there's probably a reason Amazfit

No tiene ningún sentido compañero. Es que estoy pensando que se les han colado las fuentes del Ultra 1 o del T-Rex 2 o alguna cosa muy rara porque es el único reloj de Amazfit que se ve tan mal en actividad. Sacas al mercado un reloj premium, que vale sus 550 euro y resulta que en actividad además d

I basically view the T-Rex Ultra 2 as an 51mm version of the T-Rex 3 Pro. Sure, it is slightly more premium, but functionally it is not much more than that. Offering three different sizes for the high-end is still somewhat reasonable, even though the price increase should definitely have been more m

I think the Ultra 2 is really worth when comparing to the T-Rex 3 Pro: The screen is less prone to fingerprints Much better battery life Bigger buttons Software is superior. Things will be ported to the T-Rex 3 Pro but the Ultra 2 is the premium watch that will receive the premium features 96Mb of R