SL2

Hi, thanks a lot! At the moment I’m using a Leica SL3. About a year ago I upgraded from the SL2-S, but honestly, I think it was a mistake.Yes, the SL3 has a much higher megapixel count, but I mainly use Leica R lenses via an adapter. Since those lenses aren’t really optimized for a 60MP sensor, I ca

Its reason for existence is that, aside from the Leica SL3, it is the only viable high-resolution camera for the L-mount (as the fp L, S1R, and SL2 all suffer from various flaws).

I have a pile of M mount and LTM lenses which is why I snagged the SL2 a few weeks ago. Mostly I use my Canon 50 1.4 on this body. It's so good. For manual focus - it's amazing! But now I am getting spoiled by autofocus and the 40 is kind of squishy in that regard. I mean it's ok, but a bit strange

Yeah, I think I'm going back into the Leica SL system (SL2) which is less than what this body is. We'll see how the P645 glass works with it. What swayed me in this direction was that I also have a bunch of older vintage rangefinder lenses and L39/M42 to L mount adapters. I shot the Leica SL2 before

Sure 😂 ELI5 version:I took photos from 5 different Leica cameras and compared what the cameras actually produce.I asked a very simple question:“Can one simple brightness curve describe how these cameras turn RAW information into the final image?”I expected each camera to give me a different answer.I