Air 3s Pro

Very cool. I wish the XR Glasses (RayNeo Air 3S Pro) impressed me more. The FOV was low, the image was generally very good to excellent, but the corners were often blurry and I could not get them to sit at the right sweet spot on the nose without frequent adjustment. Audio was solid too. Q3 has been

I would yeah. Of all four: Luma Pro RayNeo Air 3s XREAL One VITURE Pro XR One asterisks though is Air 3s having no diopters, it might not suit everybody. Also, I benched and own 8 different pair of XR total and the Luma Pro win in clarity, even against the Goovis G3 Max, which that in its own is qui

I had the Air 3s Pro, returned them because the color temp was different between the two panels and it bothered me (not saying this is a common defect, but it was present on my pair). I got the Xreal 1s for the wider FOV. The software enhancements alone on the 1s are worth it (Real 3D, side view), t

have you have found the focus distance? I just applied dedicated lenses based on optometrist measurement, i use for paper reading and the result is bad. The lenses itself are ok for newspaper reading, but does not work in RAy Neo Air 3s. :-) The focal distance must be much longer than usual reading