ThinkPad T14s

Lunar Lake does well at idle or low load, when most processes run on the e-cores. Fire up the P-cores and things go downhill quickly. It's a decent chip when you're not doing much but the high price makes it less attractive for consumers and the low (nonexistent?) margin for Intel makes it bad for b

I'd say if gen3 Intel has "P" CPU (higher power but worse thermals and battery) like i7-1260P, I'd prioritise T14 gen2 AMD over T14s gen3 Intel (probably with worse thermals and battery life in expense with CPU power). For a reference: https://www.reddit.com/r/thinkpad/comments/14e2yfd/t14s_gen_3_inte

225U is Arrow Lake U, not Meteor Lake, but Arrow Lake U is a refresh of that, so not entirely wrong The 225U is "fine", but it won't be much better than the 125U from last year's T14s Gen 5 - look at those reviews instead but I had heard that Intel overtook AMD in laptop chip power efficiency this g

We have almost identical models: the same chassis, keyboard, battery, screen, speakers. It was reasonable to buy it. HP offered better hardware for less money. I'm sure that the hardware of my laptop is excellent and is way better than one of my previous ThinkPad T14 gen 1. Six months ago Lenovo off

Guys, I need to ask few things because I feel a bit disappointed with this T14s Gen5- it has HORRIBLE boot times. Is that always like this in Thunderbolt 4 laptops? T14s Gen 1 starts up to 6-8 seconds. Gen 5 - about a minute.- it has more powerful CPU, but it feels like it's much slower then Gen1, e

Using this reddit user review as a source https://www.reddit.com/r/thinkpad/comments/18os5uo/thinkpad_t14s_gen_4_amd_comparison_review/ The point that stuck with me is this "(that p14sgen4 has) Better performance (33W sustained instead of 24W in Cinebench R24) So what has me concerned is that I might be p