LS50 Wireless II

I get where you are coming from but these are Self-powered LS 50 Wireless II. It’s a confusing setup in my picture. 🙃 when listening to music, I am using tidal + the built-in amps. Some (me) would argue that this is the best way to enjoy the LS 50 meta (effectively) since KEF designed the amps and t

In case anyone is confused at my setup since I mentioned LS 50 wireless II but a center channel ls 50 meta is pictured 🙃: when listening to music, I am only using the ls 50 wireless II using tidal + the built-in amps. when listening to surround content through my receiver, I am using the ls50 wirele

I'm a huge believer in dedicated amp and dsp, so ls50 wireless ii would be my choice at this time. I'd rather have tuneable dsp to integrate between drivers and parametric for each driver, but today at that price point I think the kefs are the best that can be done. I haven't heard dirac but I'm a h

KEFs website R3 meta: FREQUENCY RESPONSE (±3dB) 58Hz - 28kHz. Ls50 wireless ii: Frequency Response (±3dB) Measured at 85dB/1m 45 Hz – 28 kHz. Like I said over 10hz lower. DSP and lots of power > rectangular box with passive crossover. I have not spent time with both. I have ls50 wireless I bought ne

KEFs website R3 meta: FREQUENCY RESPONSE (±3dB) 58Hz - 28kHz. Ls50 wireless ii: Frequency Response (±3dB) Measured at 85dB/1m 45 Hz – 28 kHz. Like I said over 10hz lower. DSP and lots of power > rectangular box with passive crossover. I have not spent time with both. I have ls50 wireless I bought ne

Hi everyone, first of all, a huge thank you to everyone who took the time to share their recommendations and thoughts. I got exactly what I came for and learned an enormous amount throughout this process! Digging into the difference between active and passive systems, decoupling, to sealed vs. porte