ease of use
Mammut Smart
43 mentions
91%
Mammut Smart 2.0
40 mentions
88%
Mammut Smart vs Mammut Smart 2.0
Feature comparison
Green marks the strongest sentiment on each row, with mention count used as the tiebreaker.
braking performance
Mammut Smart
25 mentions
80%
Mammut Smart 2.0
26 mentions
92%
versatility
Mammut Smart
19 mentions
95%
Mammut Smart 2.0
17 mentions
76%
rope handling
Mammut Smart
14 mentions
64%
Mammut Smart 2.0
8 mentions
63%
lowering control
Mammut Smart
10 mentions
90%
Mammut Smart 2.0
8 mentions
88%
safety
Mammut Smart
7 mentions
100%
Mammut Smart 2.0
8 mentions
100%
durability
Mammut Smart
3 mentions
67%
Mammut Smart 2.0
3 mentions
67%
design
Mammut Smart
2 mentions
50%
Mammut Smart 2.0
3 mentions
100%
soft catch
Mammut Smart
2 mentions
100%
Mammut Smart 2.0
2 mentions
100%
weight
Mammut Smart
2 mentions
100%
Mammut Smart 2.0
1 mentions
100%
| Feature | Mammut Smart | Mammut Smart 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| ease of use | 91%
43 mentions
| 88%
40 mentions
|
| braking performance | 80%
25 mentions
| 92%
26 mentions
|
| versatility | 95%
19 mentions
| 76%
17 mentions
|
| rope handling | 64%
14 mentions
| 63%
8 mentions
|
| lowering control | 90%
10 mentions
| 88%
8 mentions
|
| safety | 100%
7 mentions
| 100%
8 mentions
|
| durability | 67%
3 mentions
| 67%
3 mentions
|
| design | 50%
2 mentions
| 100%
3 mentions
|
| soft catch | 100%
2 mentions
| 100%
2 mentions
|
| weight | 100%
2 mentions
| 100%
1 mentions
|
